By Griff Witte
June 13, 2013, GIZA, EGYPT (The Washington Post) — Since long before
the Pyramids towered above the rich soil of this riverside town,
Egyptians have given thanks to the muddy waters of the Nile.
“Plants, animals, humans,” said Ibrahim Abdel Aziz, a 45-year-old farmer, “we all come from this river.”
But trace the Nile about 1,400 miles upstream and there’s a rising
colossus that threatens to upset a millennia-old balance. There, in the
Ethiopian highlands, one of the world’s largest dams is taking shape.
For Ethiopia, the dam promises abundant energy and an escape from a
seemingly permanent spot in the lowest rungs of the world’s human
development index. But for Egypt, the consequences could be dire: a
nationwide water shortage in as little as two years that causes crop
failures, power cuts and instability resonating far beyond even the
extraordinary tumult of the recent past.
For a country facing daily domestic crises in the aftermath of its
2011 revolution, the dam is a foreign threat that Egypt can ill afford.
And that may be the point. Analysts say Ethiopia is seizing on Egypt’s
distraction and relative fragility to plunge ahead with plans that have
long been on the drawing board but have always been thwarted by Egyptian
To Egyptians accustomed to thinking of their country as a powerhouse
of the Arab world, the idea of bowing to a historically weaker African
rival has been a sobering reminder of their nation’s diminished clout.
It has also been an early test for the year-old government of President
Mohamed Morsi — one that critics say he has badly mishandled.
the options are very few,” said Talaat Mosallam, a retired major
general in Egypt’s army. Diplomacy is the first, but Cairo’s leverage is
“at rock bottom,” he said, and if talks fail, Egyptian military
commanders may decide that “it is better to die in battle than to die in
Indeed, the prospect of a water war has become a regular feature of
Egyptian newscasts and front pages in recent weeks, ever since Ethiopia
announced that it was diverting the river’s course immediately after a
meeting between Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn and Morsi
in late May.
The announcement, which marked a milestone in the dam’s progress, was
seen here as a humiliating slap and an indication that Ethiopia has no
intention to negotiate over the dam’s construction.
Morsi responded last week by convening an emergency meeting of
leaders from across Egypt’s political spectrum, a move that backfired
wildly when the presidency decided to broadcast the session live on
television without telling most of the participants.
Thinking that they were conspiring in secret, the politicians hatched
plans to arm Ethiopian rebels, launch a whispering campaign about
Egypt’s military might and send fighter jets to knock out the dam with
one swift shot.
Morsi has not been so explicit, but he warned in a Monday night
speech that “all options are open” in protecting the river, which
accounts for 95 percent of Egypt’s water needs. The country, he told a
crowd of cheering supporters, is ready to sacrifice blood to ensure that
“not one drop” of the Nile is lost.
In an interview with state media on Tuesday, Hailemariam dismissed
that as warmongering meant to distract from Egypt’s domestic issues.
“I don’t think they will take that option unless they go mad,” he
said. The same day, the Ethiopian Foreign Ministry said in a statement
that the nation “will not even for a second” stop the dam’s
‘A disaster for Egypt’
The standoff reflects the critical importance of controlling the
region’s water resources at a time of rapidly rising populations. Egypt
and Ethiopia each have more than 80 million people, double the
population that existed just 30 years ago. By 2050, the combined
population of the two countries is expected to rise by 100 million, even
as climate change could reduce the supply of water.
Nonetheless, Ethiopia has said repeatedly that the Grand Renaissance
Dam won’t cause a problem for Egypt. Ethiopian officials say the dam
will be used to generate electricity, not to irrigate fields, meaning
that all the water will eventually make its way downstream to Egypt.
Those officials see the dam as a chance to make right a colonial-era
wrong that has preserved most of the Nile’s water for Egypt while
leaving little benefit for upstream countries.
Egypt may be the gift of the Nile, as the Greek historian Herodotus
once remarked, but the Nile is not Egypt’s alone. Eleven countries share
the basin of the world’s longest river, which winds through much of
East Africa before emptying into the Mediterranean in northern Egypt.
Ethiopia has won the majority of those countries to its side with the
promise of electricity exports for a region that desperately needs new
sources of energy. It has even offered to sell some of the dam’s 6,000
megawatts to Egypt.
Far from being soothed by Ethiopia’s promises, however, Egyptians
have become increasingly panicked. And with good reason, according to
former Egyptian water minister Mohamed Nasr Allam.
Allam said that if Ethiopia goes ahead with its plans to build the
dam on the Blue Nile — which accounts for the majority of the Nile’s
flow after converging with the White Nile in Sudan — Egypt could lose a
quarter of its water.
“It will be a disaster for Egypt,” Allam said. “Large areas of the country will be simply taken out of production.”
Experts see the greatest peril for Egypt when Ethiopia fills the
massive reservoir behind its dam, a process that could begin in 2015 and
last as long as six years. Even afterward, however, the creation of the
dam will mean that Egypt no longer has direct control over its primary
water source, a troubling prospect for a country that receives
negligible rainfall and is considered the world’s largest oasis.
Allam said Egypt should try to persuade Ethiopia to lower the
550-foot height of the dam, which would mitigate the effect. Ultimately,
he said, international powers, including the United States, may be
called in to help mediate.
A regional power struggle
The U.S. State Department has said that Egypt and Ethiopia, both
American allies, should resolve the dispute through dialogue. But that
dialogue would come at a time when Ethiopia’s influence in the region
appears to be rising and Egypt’s is waning.
Hani Raslan, who heads the Nile Basin studies department at Cairo’s
al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, said it is no
coincidence that Ethiopia announced plans to massively expand the dam
and forge ahead with its construction just weeks after Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak was ousted in early 2011.
“Ethiopia has aspirations to be a regional power at Egypt’s expense,”
Raslan said. “It is taking advantage of the instability after the
revolution, especially now that there’s a weak Muslim Brotherhood
president with no experience whatsoever who is not in sync with the
institutions of the state.”
That’s a common sentiment on the streets of Egypt, and on the Nile,
where fishermen, farmers and boat operators remember the country’s
pre-revolutionary history with a heavy dose of nostalgia.
“When Mubarak was running the country, we didn’t hear about electric
outages or fuel shortages. And no one would dare say that they would cut
the water of Egypt,” said Abdel Arabi, 39, who sat on a tour boat
watching sundown’s rays glint off the Nile as birds swooped in for the
evening’s final catch.
For Abdel Aziz, the 45-year-old farmer, Ethiopia’s plans mean that
his extended family of 28, which supports itself on a quarter-acre of
corn, okra and eggplant fields, may go hungry.
“The water goes down, and it goes up,” he said. “But now it may go lower and never come back again.”
If it does, he said, there’s no question of the outcome: “An even bigger revolution, worse than the last one.”